Market Anarchy (Re: ?s for conservatives. Three questions aimed at premise: At the macro-level, how does the volume of donations from one group of citizens make a political position true? Second, is there a way to tell if those 34 RP donors are ‘crazy’ people? After all, it is the military… Third, what are your next steps after RP loses?)

Text

Anonymous asked: Re: ?s for conservatives. Three questions aimed at premise: At the macro-level, how does the volume of donations from one group of citizens make a political position true? Second, is there a way to tell if those 34 RP donors are 'crazy' people? After all, it is the military... Third, what are your next steps after RP loses?
I never said it made it true. I just said conservatives always say we should let the generals and troops run wars rather than politicians in Washington. But yet more active duty donations goes to Ron Paul and those same conservatives call his foreign policy views crazy. So crazy he gets more money from the same people conservatives say should be running the wars?

Like I said above, conservatives call Ron Paul “crazy” because of his foreign policy views. You have “conservatives” like Sean Hannity say he agrees with Ron Paul 95% of the time but because of his “crazy” foreign policy views he can’t support him. So basically Hannity is calling the military men and women crazy because they donate to Ron Paul more often than anyone else.

If Ron Paul loses, like I’ve said before, Obama is going to get re-elected. I don’t claim to speak for every Ron Paul supporter, libertarian, or anarchist but I know a good majority of us won’t vote for Mitt Romney if he is the nominee as he is basically a Bush/Obama clone.

If Ron Paul isn’t the Republican nominee I’ll be voting for Gary Johnson as the libertarian candidate as I’m sure most of those who agree with me will be too.